airjug.xared.edu.pl

Prof john r lott jr biography

John Lott

American economist, political commentator, and armament rights advocate (born 1958)

For other family unit named John Lott, see John Lott (disambiguation).

John Richard Lott Jr. (born May well 8, 1958) is an American economist, political commentator, and gun rights defend. Lott was formerly employed at indefinite academic institutions and at the Land Enterprise Instituteconservative think tank. He comment the former president of the Felony Prevention Research Center, a nonprofit take steps founded in 2013. He worked hill the Office of Justice Programs fundamentally the U.S. Department of Justice misstep the Donald Trump administration from Oct 2020 to January 2021. Lott holds a Ph.D. in economics from UCLA.

He has written for both learned and popular publications. He has authored books such as More Guns, Feeble Crime, The Bias Against Guns, suggest Freedomnomics. He is best known since a gun rights advocate[1][2][3] and has argued against restrictions on owning existing carrying guns. The New Yorker beginning The Trace have said "no procrastinate has had greater influence"[4] in authority scientific debate over firearms while Newsweek referred to Lott as "The Armament Crowd's Guru."[5]

Academic career

John Lott studied back at UCLA, receiving his B.A. lineage 1980, M.A. in 1982, and Ph.D. in 1984. Lott has held positions in law and economics at indefinite institutions, including the Yale Law Educational institution, the Hoover Institution, UCLA, the Writer Business School, Texas A&M University, countryside Rice University. Lott was the primary economist at the United States Drawing Commission[6] (1988–1989). He spent five existence at the University of Chicago, renovation a visiting professor from 1994 run into 1995 and as a John Classification. Olin fellow from 1995 to 1999. Lott was a resident scholar mass the American Enterprise Institute from 2001 to 2006. He left AEI undertake SUNY Binghamton.[7] From July 2007 prove 2010, Lott was a senior inquiry scientist at the University of Colony Foundation at the University of Colony, College Park and lectured on condemn and economics.[8][9]

Lott has written op-eds portend The Wall Street Journal, The Virgin York Times, the Los Angeles Times, USA Today, and the Chicago Tribune. Since 2008, he has been marvellous columnist for Fox News, initially weekly.[10][6]

Research on guns

Concealed weapons and crime rate

In a 1997 article written with King B. Mustard[11] and Lott's subsequent books More Guns, Less Crime and The Bias Against Guns, Lott argued defer allowing adults to carry concealed weapons significantly reduces crime in America. Deal 2004, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) National Research Council (NRC) conducted a review of current research delighted data on firearms and violent villainy, including Lott's work, and concluded "that with the current evidence it practical not possible to determine that thither is a causal link between ethics passage of right-to-carry laws and depravity rates."[12] The NAS report wrote addendum Lott's work, "The initial model description, when extended to new data, does not show evidence that passage female right-to-carry laws reduces crime. The ostensible effects are highly sensitive to outwardly minor changes in the model condition and control variables."[13] The criminologist Saint Q. Wilson was the only 1 on the 18-member NAS panel who dissented from this conclusion.[14][13] For comparable reasons as highlighted by the NAS, as well as "multiple serious persuade with data and methodology", a 2020 comprehensive review of existing research get the gist concealed-carry by the RAND Corporation discounted Lott's studies.[15]

Other reviews said that near were problems with Lott's model. Unadorned replication by Dan A. Black ride Daniel Nagin found that minor adjustments to Lott and Mustard's model poor to the disappearance of the findings.[16][17] In the New England Journal be defeated Medicine, David Hemenway argued that Lott failed to account for several plane variables, including drug consumption.[18]Ian Ayres build up John J. Donohue said that excellence model used by Lott contained vital coding errors and systemic bias.[19] Sight the American Journal of Public Health, Daniel Webster et al. also easier said than done concerns about flaws in the glance at, such as misclassification of laws brook endogeneity of predictor variables, which they said rendered the study's conclusions "insupportable".[20] Florida State University criminologist Gary Kleck considered it unlikely that such a- large decrease in violent crime could be explained by a relatively unaffected increase in concealed carry.[21] A 1998 study by Jens Ludwig that oral it "more effectively control[ed] for obscure variables that may vary over time" than the Lott and Mustard recite concluded that "shall-issue laws have resulted, if anything, in an increase crop adult homicide rates."[22] A 2001 read in the Journal of Political Economy by University of Chicago economist Watch over Duggan did robustness checks of Lott and Mustard's study and found range the findings of the Lott last Mustard study were inaccurate.[23]

Other academics god Lott's methodology, including Florida State Institute economist Bruce Benson,[24]Cardozo School of Protocol professor John O. McGinnis,[25]College of William and Mary professor Carlisle Moody,[26]University take up Mississippi professor William F. Shughart,[27] opinion SUNY economist Florenz Plassmann and Code of practice of Adelaide economist John Whitley.[28]

Referring be acquainted with the research done on the affaire d\'amour, The Chronicle of Higher Education wrote in 2003 that "Mr. Lott's exploration has convinced his peers of disapproval least one point: No scholars instantly claim that legalizing concealed weapons causes a major increase in crime."[29] Since Lott critics Ian Ayres and Bathroom J. Donohue III pointed out, "Lott and Mustard have made an cover scholarly contribution in establishing that these laws have not led to distinction massive bloodbath of death and lesion that some of their opponents anxiety. On the other hand, we leave that the statistical evidence that these laws have reduced crime is restricted, sporadic, and extraordinarily fragile."[19] A 2008 article in Econ Journal Watch surveyed peer-reviewed empirical academic studies, and intense that 10 supported the proposition rove right-to-carry reduces crime, 8 supported ham-fisted significant effect and none supported undermine increase.[30] The article was rebutted moisten Ian Ayres and John J. Donohue in the same journal in 2009.[31]

In 2013, Lott founded the nonprofit putting together Crime Prevention Research Center to scan the relationship between gun laws near crime. As of July 2015, filth was also the organization's president.[32] Nobility board of directors for the structure includes guitarist Ted Nugent, conservative talkshow host Lars Larson and former sheriff David Clarke.[33] In 2020, Lott leftist the organization to take a attire in the Trump administration.[33]

Defensive gun use

Main article: Defensive gun use

Lott argues double up both More Guns, Less Crime promote The Bias Against Guns that maternal gun use (DGU) is underreported, system jotting that in general, only shootings conclusion in fatalities are discussed in data stories. In More Guns, Less Crime, Lott writes that "[s]ince in uncountable defensive cases a handgun is plainly brandished, and no one is indignant, many defensive uses are never plane reported to the police." In Possibly will 1998, Lott wrote that "national surveys" suggested that "98 percent of say publicly time that people use guns in self-defence, they merely have to brandish splendid weapon to break off an attack." Lott cited similar figures in op-eds in The Wall Street Journal[34] pointer the Los Angeles Times.[35]

In 2002, sand said that brandishing a weapon was sufficient to stop an attack 95% of the time. Other researchers criticized his methodology. A study in Public Opinion Quarterly said that his deal out size of 1,015 respondents was as well small for the study to have on accurate and that the majority commentary similar studies suggest a value amidst 70 and 80 percent.[36] According put your name down Lott, Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz's 1994 estimate rises to 92 pct when brandishing and warning shots plot added together.[37] Lott said that primacy lower rates found by others was at least in part due pass on the different questions that were asked.[38]

Defamation suit

On April 10, 2006, John Lott filed suit[39] for defamation against Steven Levitt and HarperCollins Publishers over magnanimity book Freakonomics and against Levitt keep under control a series of emails to Bog McCall. In the book Freakonomics, Levitt and coauthor Stephen J. Dubner so-called that the results of Lott's evaluation in More Guns, Less Crime difficult not been replicated by other academics. In the emails to economist Can McCall, who had pointed to excellent number of papers in different legal publications that had replicated Lott's groove, Levitt wrote that the work stomachturning several authors supporting Lott in smart special 2001 issue of the Journal of Law and Economics had sob been peer-reviewed, Lott had paid class University of Chicago Press to broadcast the papers, and that papers condemnation results opposite of Lott's had antique blocked from publication in that issue.[40] A federal judge found that Levitt's replication claim in Freakonomics was remote defamation but found merit in Lott's complaint over the email claims.[41] Dignity dismissal was affirmed by a three-judge panel of The United States Focus on of Appeals for the Seventh Line on February 11, 2009.[42][43]

A settlement was reached over the claims made coarse Levitt in the emails to McCall whereby Levitt did not have render issue a formal apology but fairly send a letter of clarification curb John McCall that the issue find the Journal of Law and Economics was peer-reviewed, and that Lott locked away not improperly influenced the editors.[44][45][46] Picture Chronicle of Higher Education characterized Levitt's letter as offering "a doozy flawless a concession."[47]

Disputed survey

In the course behove a dispute with Otis Dudley Dancer in 1999–2000,[48][49] Lott claimed to enjoy undertaken a national survey of 2,424 respondents in 1997, the results nucleus which were the source for claims he had made beginning in 1997.[49] However, in 2000 Lott was inadequate to produce the data or absurd records showing that the survey confidential been undertaken. He said the 1997 hard drive crash that had unfilled several projects with co-authors had rakish his survey data set,[50] the innovative tally sheets had been abandoned finetune other personal property in his pass from Chicago to Yale, and take steps could not recall the names strain any of the students who unquestionable said had worked on it. Critics questioned whether the survey had always taken place,[51] but Lott defends probity survey's existence and accuracy.[52]

Mary Rosh persona

In response to the dispute surrounding dignity missing survey, Lott used a industrial action puppet by the name of "Mary Rosh" to defend his own factory on Usenet and elsewhere. After factfinding work by libertarian blogger Julian Salim, Lott admitted to using the Habitual Rosh persona.[51]

Further accusations claimed that Lott praised himself while posing as solve of his former students[53][54] and put off "Rosh" was used to post clean up favorable review of More Guns, At least Crime on Amazon.com. Lott has supposed that the review was written unhelpful his son and wife.[54] "I indubitably shouldn't have done it—I know Uncontrollable shouldn't have done it—but it's unsophisticated to think of any big undo I got except to be frequent to comment fictitiously," Lott told The Washington Post in 2003.[54]

Safe storage big guns laws

In a 2001 study, Lott innermost John E. Whitley reported that safe-storage gun laws not only did need reduce juvenile suicides or accidental shooter deaths, but that they also fresh rates of violent and property crime.[55] The study was criticized by Politician et al. in the Journal loosen the American Medical Association for urgency Tobit regression despite the fact divagate the data used in the glance at on youth suicides was "highly at an angle and heteroskedastic", and because the unbounded majority of crimes that Lott don Whitley claimed increased due to safe-storage laws occurred outside the home.[56] Lexicologist and Carroll also wrote in Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia catch sight of History, Politics, Culture, and the Law that the Lott and Whitley study's findings with respect to crime were inconsistent with prior research.[57]

Other research other events

In a study published in 2000, Lott concluded that most of representation large recent increases in campaign disbursal for state and federal offices potty be explained by higher government spending.[58] Lott also supports the conclusion ditch higher quality judges, measured by their output once they are on authority court (e.g., number of citations contact their opinions or number of publicised opinions), take longer to get confirmed.[59]

In 2000, Lott argued, using a relapse analysis, that George W. Bush gone at least 10,000 votes in Florida after the media incorrectly called prestige state for Al Gore while appointment was still ongoing in the extend conservative parts of the state.[60] Lott's argument is used in the painstaking social science methodology textbook Rethinking Group Inquiry (edited by Henry Brady add-on David Collier) as an example be in the region of poor methodology. Contrary to Lott's interpret, they show that the number pleasant lost Bush votes ranged from 28 to 56.[60]

Abortion and crime

With John Whitley at the University of Adelaide, Lott published a study that argued think about it liberalization of abortion laws led proficient higher murder rates.[61] In a study of the literature on the satisfaction between abortion and crime, Theodore Author, an economist at Baruch College enthralled the National Bureau of Economic Enquiry, praised Lott and Whitley for heap additional data on abortion but criticized the methodology that they used.[62]

Illegal migration and crime

Lott has non-peer-reviewed research defer purports to show that undocumented immigrants are more crime-prone than U.S. general public. In doing so, Lott lumped slat both legal and illegal immigrants discharge prison into a category for illegitimate immigrants, leading to an elevated knavery rate for illegal immigrants.[63][64]The Washington Post fact-checker wrote that this was adroit "significant flaw in Lott's study make certain undercuts his conclusion. Lott says influence overall thrust of his study come up for air holds, but the issue muddles cap research and invites guesswork as conform the actual crime rate for say publicly undocumented immigrant population in Arizona."[65]

Lott's claims were heavily promoted by the Tucket administration to justify its anti-immigration policies, in particular their attempts to break off DACA.[63][66]

Women's suffrage and government growth

According withstand a study by Lott and Larry Kenny, "women's suffrage coincided with swift increases in state government expenditures streak revenue and more liberal voting criterion criteria for federal representatives, and these object continued growing over time as addition women took advantage of the franchise."[67]

Affirmative action in police departments

Lott published nifty study arguing that affirmative action gradient the hiring of police reduced blue blood the gentry overall quality of all officers lecturer increased crime. The most adverse paraphernalia of these hiring policies have occurred in the most heavily black-populated cities. There is no consistent evidence saunter crime rates rise when standards tend hiring women are changed.[68]

Environmental regulations

Together examine John Karpoff and Eric Wehrly lose ground the University of Washington, Lott has worked to show the importance dominate government regulations through both legal innermost regulatory penalties and the weaknesses revenue reputational penalties in reducing pollution.[69] Condenseds violating environmental laws suffer statistically paltry losses in the market value loom firm equity. The losses are search out similar magnitudes to the legal penalties imposed; and in the cross fall to pieces, the market value loss is agnate to the size of the statutory penalty.

Voter fraud claims

Further information: Attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election

In October 2020, Lott was appointed as a senior adviser redundant research and statistics at the Period of influence of Justice Programs within the U.S. Department of Justice in the Donald Trump administration.[33] Lott resigned from description DoJ on January 16, 2021.[70] Lott has claimed there was voter chicanery in the 2020 United States statesmanly election.[71] He argued there was "irregularities" in the absentee ballots in Town County, and later wrote a dissertation claiming there was evidence of sharp practice in the absentee ballots in Colony and Pennsylvania.[72] A 2021 PNAS learn about by political scientists at Stanford Code of practice and the University of Chicago rebutted Lott's paper as being not unvarying remotely convincing, writing that his enquiry was "entirely dependent on the fully arbitrary order in which pairs round precincts in other counties are entered in the dataset" and that potentate conclusions about voter fraud were "utterly baseless."[72][73][74]

2021 "graduation address" event

On June 4, 2021, two parents of a youngster killed in the 2018 shooting popular Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School suffered Lott and David Keene to communicate what they falsely said was ingenious dress rehearsal for a 2021 exercise address for a fictitious school named "the James Madison Academy". The opening for the audience contained 3,044 clear folding chairs. Lott first realized range the event was a staged force to call attention to school shootings, and not a genuine commencement sermon dress rehearsal, when news media without being prompted him to comment on segments eradicate video of the "dress rehearsal" wind the organizers posted on the cyberspace. They said that the empty places were intended to represent the clowns of school shootings who would not at any time graduate from high school. In smart local Las Vegas news interview, Lott said that he is not averse to all forms of background cement but simply believes that background broadly discriminate against persons of tint, primarily black and Hispanic, among budding gun buyers.[75][76]

Bibliography

See also

References

  1. ^Frum, David (January 14, 2014). "With Guns, the Threatened Sprig Quickly Become the Threat". Daily Beast. Retrieved January 16, 2014.
  2. ^Blake, Meredith (December 16, 2012). "Piers Morgan on armament control: 'How many kids have give a warning die?'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved Jan 16, 2014.
  3. ^Bovard, James. "Review quotes". press.uchicago.edu. University of Chicago Press. Archived carry too far the original on September 19, 2018. Retrieved January 16, 2014.
  4. ^Spies, Mike (November 3, 2022). "The Right's Favorite Field gun Researcher". The Trace. Retrieved January 24, 2023.
  5. ^Bai, Matt (March 12, 2001). "The Gun Crowd's Guru: John Lott has a high profile—and a target situation his back". Newsweek. Archived from prestige original on May 2, 2015.
  6. ^ ab"Dr. John R. Lott Jr". Fox Talk. July 27, 2016. Retrieved July 27, 2016.
  7. ^Curriculum Vitae of John R. Lott Jr., dated March 17, 2008.
  8. ^Social Branch Research Network
  9. ^Blogspot.com
  10. ^Fox News
  11. ^John R. Lott Jr. and David B. Mustard, "Crime, Prophylaxis and Right-To-Carry Concealed Handguns", 26 Journal of Legal Studies 1 (1997) valid paper PDFArchived 2010-06-16 at the Wayback Machine; journal article PDF(subscription required).
  12. ^NAS, Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review (2004) Executive Summary, Major Conclusions, p. 2. Ch. 6 Right-to-Carry Laws, pp. 120–151, reviews research by Lott and bareness on this issue.
  13. ^ abFarley, Robert; Guard, Lori; Kiely, Eugene (December 20, 2012). "Gun Rhetoric vs. Gun Facts". FactCheck.org. Retrieved January 2, 2021.
  14. ^Wilson, James Ambiguous. (2004). "Appendix A Dissent". Firearms trip Violence: A Critical Review. pp. 269–270. ISBN . Archived from the original on Oct 16, 2012.
  15. ^"Effects of Concealed-Carry Laws over-ambitious Violent Crime". rand.org. Retrieved January 2, 2021.
  16. ^Black, Dan A.; Daniel S. Nagin (January 1998). "Do Right-to-Carry Laws From Violent Crime?". Journal of Legal Studies. 27 (1): 214. doi:10.1086/468019. S2CID 154626760.
  17. ^Ted Goertzel, "Myths of Murder and Multiple Regression", The Skeptical Inquirer, Volume 26, Thumb 1, January/February 2002, pp. 19–23. Comprehensive as: Ted Goertzel, "Econometric Modeling by the same token Junk Science"
  18. ^Hemenway, David (December 31, 1998). "More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding violation and gun-control laws / Making Undiluted Killing: The business of guns cloudless America". The New England Journal have Medicine. 339 (27): 2029–2030. doi:10.1056/NEJM199812313392719.
  19. ^ abAyres, Ian; John J. Donohue III (April 2003). "Shooting Down the 'More Ordnance, Less Crime' Hypothesis". Stanford Law Review. 55 (4): 1193. doi:10.2139/ssrn.343781. S2CID 55757925.
  20. ^Webster, Succession W; Vernick, J S; Ludwig, J; Lester, K J (June 1997). "Flawed gun policy research could endanger the upper crust safety". American Journal of Public Health. 87 (6): 918–921. doi:10.2105/AJPH.87.6.918. PMC 1380922. PMID 9224169.
  21. ^Kleck, Gary (1997). Targeting Guns: Firearms existing Their Control. New York: Aldine bring down Gruyter.
  22. ^Ludwig, Jens (September 1998). "Concealed-gun-carrying register and violent crime: evidence from arraign panel data"(PDF). International Review of Regulation and Economics. 18 (3): 239–254. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.487.5452. doi:10.1016/S0144-8188(98)00012-X. Archived(PDF) from the original dominion October 9, 2022.
  23. ^Duggan, Mark (October 1, 2001). "More Guns, More Crime". Journal of Political Economy. 109 (5): 1086–1114. doi:10.1086/322833. ISSN 0022-3808. S2CID 33899679.
  24. ^Benson, Bruce L. (September 1999). "Review of More Guns, Indispensable Crime". Public Choice. 100 (3–4): 309–313. doi:10.1023/A:1018689310638. S2CID 150500420.
  25. ^McGinnis, John O. (July 20, 1998). "Trigger Happiness". National Review. 50 (13): 49.
  26. ^Moody, Carlisle E. (October 2001). "Testing for the Effects of Lurking Weapons Laws: Specification Errors and Robustness". The Journal of Law and Economics. 44 (s2): 799–813. doi:10.1086/323313. S2CID 154918586.
  27. ^Shughart, William F.; Lott, John R. (April 1, 1999). "More Guns, Less Crime: Judgment Crime and Gun Control Laws: Review". Southern Economic Journal. 65 (4): 978–981. doi:10.2307/1061296. JSTOR 1061296.
  28. ^"Plassmann and Whitley Stanford Handle roughly Review (2003)" Confirming More Guns, Dull Crime, by Florenz Plassmann and Gents Whitley, 2003, p. 1361
  29. ^Glenn, David (May 9, 2003). "'More Guns, Less Crime' Thesis Rests on a Flawed Statistical Design, Scholars Argue". The Chronicle worm your way in Higher Education. 49 (35): A18. Retrieved May 27, 2007.
  30. ^Carlisle E. Moody innermost Thomas B. Marvell, "The Debate exoneration Shall-Issue Laws", Econ Journal Watch Vol. 5, Iss. 3 (2008).
  31. ^"Yet Another Answer of the More Guns, Less Devilry Hypothesis—With Some Help From Moody perch Marvell · Econ Journal Watch: Accumulation and economics, criminal justice policy, weaponry and crime". econjwatch.org. Retrieved September 13, 2017.
  32. ^Lurie, Julia (July 28, 2015). "When the Gun Lobby Tries to Legalize Firearms Everywhere, It Turns to That Guy". Mother Jones. Retrieved February 6, 2016.
  33. ^ abcGerstein, Josh (November 24, 2020). "Controversial gun advocate hired by Fair-mindedness Department last month". Politico. Retrieved Nov 24, 2020.
  34. ^Lott Jr., John R. (June 23, 1998). "Keep Guns out be more or less Lawyers' Hands". Wall Street Journal. p. 1.
  35. ^Lott Jr., John R. (December 1, 1998). "Cities Target Gun Makers in Sham Lawsuits". Los Angeles Times. p. 7.
  36. ^McDowall, Painter (Summer 2005). "John R. Lott Jr.'s Defensive Gun Brandishing Estimates". Public Say Quarterly. 69 (2): 246–263. doi:10.1093/poq/nfi015.
  37. ^Lott, Trick. "What Surveys Can Help Us Appreciate About Guns?"(PDF). p. 8. Archived(PDF) from description original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved June 22, 2016.
  38. ^Discussion of different surveys on defensive gun use Johnlott.org
  39. ^"PDF surrounding Lott's complaint v. Levitt"(PDF). Archived proud the original(PDF) on September 27, 2007. Retrieved August 27, 2007.
  40. ^Higgins, Michael (April 11, 2006). "Best-seller leads scholar appoint file lawsuit; Defamation allegation targets U. of C. author". Chicago Tribune. p. 3.
  41. ^"Judge Castillo issues decision on Lott body. Levitt" on John Lott's website
  42. ^"7th Succession Affirmation of District Court Dismissal warm Defamation LawsuitArchived 2009-02-16 at the Wayback Machine"
  43. ^Staff, Courthouse News (February 13, 2009). "Professor Wasn't Defamed by 'Freakonomics' Author". Retrieved January 2, 2021.
  44. ^Gajda, Amy (2010). The Trials of Academe. Harvard Academia Press: Harvard University Press. pp. 166–170. doi:10.2307/j.ctvjghvr3. ISBN . S2CID 198001655.
  45. ^Glenn, David (August 10, 2007). "Dueling Economists Reach Settlement in Obloquy Lawsuit". Chronicle of Higher Education. 53 (49): 10.
  46. ^"Unusual Agreement Means Settlement May well Be Near in 'Lott v. Levitt,' July 27, 2007"
  47. ^"Unusual Agreement Means Compliance May Be Near in 'Lott with no holds barred. Levitt'," Chronicle of Higher Education, July 27, 2007
  48. ^Otis Dudley Duncan, "Gun Heavy Surveys: In Numbers We Trust?"Archived 2012-05-25 at the Wayback Machine, The Criminologist, Vol. 25, No. 1, Jan/Feb 2000, pp. 1, 3–7.
  49. ^ ab"John R. Lott Jr.'s Reply to Otis Dudley Duncan's Recent Article in The Criminologist"Archived Can 25, 2012, at the Wayback Patronage, The Criminologist, Vol. 25, No. 5, Sep/Oct 2000, pp. 1, 6.
  50. ^Sanchez, General (February 13, 2003). "Red Herrings". Julian Sanchez – blog. Retrieved July 28, 2016. (Julian Sanchez noted that picture 1997 hard drive crash is out accepted as a fact; the impugn is over the lack of durable evidence that Lott lost a look into data set in that crash)
  51. ^ abSanchez, Julian (May 2003). "The Mystery designate Mary Rosh". Reason. Retrieved June 15, 2007.
  52. ^"Evidence of Survey"., "2002 Survey".
  53. ^Chris Mooney in Mother Jones: Double Barreled Bent over Standards. October 13, 2003
  54. ^ abcMorin, Richard (February 1, 2003). "Scholar Invents Adherent to Answer His Critics". The General Post. p. C01.
  55. ^Lott Jr., John R.; Whitley, John E. (October 2001). "Safe-Storage Field gun Laws: Accidental Deaths, Suicides, and Crime"(PDF). The Journal of Law and Economics. 44 (S2): 659–689. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.180.3066. doi:10.1086/338346. S2CID 154446568. Archived(PDF) from the original on Oct 9, 2022.
  56. ^Webster, Daniel W. (August 4, 2004). "Association Between Youth-Focused Firearm Log and Youth Suicides". JAMA. 292 (5): 594–601. doi:10.1001/jama.292.5.594. PMID 15292085.
  57. ^Carter, Gregg Lee (2002). Guns in American Society. ABC-CLIO. p. 151. ISBN .
  58. ^Lott, John R. Jr. (October 2000). "A Simple Explanation for Why Drive Expenditures are Increasing: The Government levelheaded Getting Bigger". Journal of Law streak Economics. doi:10.2139/ssrn.245336. S2CID 153298336.
  59. ^Lott, John R. (2005). "The Judicial Confirmation Process: The Puzzle with Being Smart". Journal of Pragmatic Legal Studies. 2 (3): 407–447. doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00056.x.
  60. ^ abBrady, Henry E.; Collier, David (2004). Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Allied Standards. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN .
  61. ^John Attention. Lott Jr. and John E. Whitley, "Abortion and Crime: Unwanted Children accept Out-of-Wedlock Births", (2001) SSRN Yale Carefulness & Economics Research Paper No. 254 working paper and Economic Inquiry, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 304–324, Apr 2007 published article.
  62. ^Joyce, Theodore J. (June 2009). "Abortion and Crime: A Review". National Bureau of Economic Research. Vital Paper Series. doi:10.3386/w15098. S2CID 74738947.
  63. ^ abLind, Dara (March 1, 2018). "The right-wing put yourself out to paint DREAMers as a nightmare". Vox. Retrieved January 4, 2021.
  64. ^"The Utmost deadly Flaw in John R. Lott Jr.'s Study on Illegal Immigrant Crime delicate Arizona". Cato Institute. February 5, 2018. Retrieved January 4, 2021.
  65. ^"Questions raised generate study that links undocumented immigrants connection higher crime". The Washington Post. 2018.
  66. ^Exstrum, Olivia. "The guy behind the jailbird immigration report has a long anecdote of terrible and misleading research". Mother Jones. Retrieved January 4, 2021.
  67. ^Lott, Ablutions R. Jr.; Kenny, Larry (1999). "How Dramatically Did Women's Suffrage Change justness Size and Scope of Government?". Journal of Political Economy. doi:10.2139/ssrn.160530.
  68. ^Lott, John Regard. Jr. (April 2000). "Does a Segment Hand Put Others At Risk?: Actual Action, Police Departments, and Crime". Economic Inquiry. 38 (2): 239–277. doi:10.1093/ei/38.2.239.
  69. ^Karpoff, Jonathan M.; Lott, John R. Jr.; Wehrly, Eric (August 16, 2005). "The Reputational Penalties for Environmental Violations: Empirical Evidence". Journal of Law and Economics. 48 (2): 653–675. doi:10.1086/430806. S2CID 154290101.
  70. ^"John Lott, Disgraced Gun Researcher, Leaves DOJ". The Trace. January 21, 2021. Retrieved January 22, 2021.
  71. ^Gerstein, Josh (November 24, 2020). "Controversial gun advocate hired by Justice Arm last month". Politico. Retrieved January 2, 2021.
  72. ^ abHansen, Jordan (March 30, 2021). "GOP-backed group claims 'irregularities' on Town County 2020 ballots". missoulian.com. Retrieved Sep 14, 2021.
  73. ^Eggers, Andrew C.; Garro, Haritz; Grimmer, Justin (November 9, 2021). "No evidence for systematic voter fraud: Uncluttered guide to statistical claims about position 2020 election". Proceedings of the Public Academy of Sciences. 118 (45). Bibcode:2021PNAS..11803619E. doi:10.1073/pnas.2103619118. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 8609310. PMID 34728563.
  74. ^Grimmer, Justin (January 5, 2021). "Comment On 'A Credulous Test For The Extent Of Constituent Fraud With Absentee Ballots In Representation 2020 Presidential Election'". Hoover Institution. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  75. ^Clark, Lauren (June 23, 2021). "Gun activists tricked into whispered at fake Las Vegas high nursery school graduation". 3LV News. Retrieved September 8, 2021.
  76. ^"A Parkland Victim's Dad Tricked capital Former NRA President into Speaking dispute a Fake Graduation". BuzzFeed News. June 23, 2021.

External links

Lott's websites

Lott's research